Jim Naleid's - TEC Blog

Showing posts with label Leaders. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leaders. Show all posts

Monday, April 29, 2013

Lead with Your Strengths...




But learn to use both hands...

ONE OF A KIND

Greg (A.) Harris enjoyed a 14-year baseball career in the major leagues playing for 9 different teams beginning with the New York Mets in 1981 and throwing his last pitch in a Montreal Expo uniform. To date, there is no other major league pitcher on record who was a 'switch pitcher.' For the uninitiated, that means he could throw a baseball with either arm just about as effectively with either.

Game rules during his stint didn't allow for him to utilize this unique skill but as he was closing out his final season with the Expo's, he was allowed to do so. On September 28, 1995 and in the ninth inning against the Cincinnati Reds Harris retired Reggie Sanders pitching right-handed, then switched to his left hand for the next two hitters, Hall Morris and Ed Taubensee, who both batted lefty. Harris walked Morris but got Taubensee to ground out. He then went back to his right hand to retire Bret Boone to end the inning.

As spectacular a feat this is, my guess is that you have forgotten of or had never heard of Greg Allen Harris. Beyond that, it may matter little to you that he had this unusual athletic ability. (For the record, Pat Vindette, a kid from Omaha is now playing in the minor leagues that can 'switch-throw' with either arm at 90 mph.)
 
Pat Vindette
Had Harris even been allowed to 'switch-throw' during games while in the league, my guess is that he would still naturally favor his stronger right arm. Opponents eventually would figure out how to deal with the 'switch-pitching.'

USE WHAT WORKS

Business leaders also tend to "throw' with their strong arm or manage to their perceived and or recognized strengths. While that may seem the natural thing to do, a bigger problem is that most leaders rely on that strength far too often. Staying with the baseball analogy, it could be likened to a pitcher who has a great fastball or 'slider' but little else. Simply put, a pitcher with a versatile array of pitches outlasts and outsmarts his opponents more often than not.

Robert Kaplan and Robert Kaiser, in their recent release, Fear Your Strengths, do a masterful job of helping leaders understand what a lack of management versatility can mean and the impact it can have on organizations.

"Strategically oriented leaders are lauded for their aggressiveness and vision, but often criticized for not being sufficiently grounded in reality. Operationally oriented leaders are admired for their focus and their ability to systematically drive the organization toward its goals, but they are frequently faulted for having tunnel vision and a lack of strategic boldness. Although it may seem that that these are inherently different and mutually exclusive kinds of leaders, they are in truth prime examples of lopsided leadership. They are leaders who overuse one set of strengths at the expense of under-using others."[1]

Most leaders will resist the notion that their approach to leading and management is, well, lopsided. As a result of depending solely on their strengths, they, more often than not, approach the thorniest of challenges with the same mind and skill-set.  They tend to 'over power' the opponent, challenge or issue in a way that is satisfactory in the short run but detrimental to the long-term objectives of the company.

Kaplan and Kaiser found that there is a distinct difference in results between companies whose leaders lack versatility and those whose leaders have developed a diversified 'portfolio' of skills with which they effectively lead.

"Versatility defined as striking a balance on both the forceful-enabling and strategic-operational dimensions accounts for about half of what separates the most effective leaders from the least effective leaders."[2]

LEADERSHIP PERFECTION DOESN'T EXIST

Kaplan and Kaiser have compiled a database of executives that numbers close to 7,000 and they admit there are few leaders among them that have developed a complete repertoire of operational, strategic and visionary skills. Understandably, those that rise closer to the top of the list have long-lasting success that wears well over time.

As they see it, there are three primary steps that leaders in pursuit of versatile excellence must take.

1.)           Accept Yourself
                "You must unflinchingly reconcile yourself to the reality of who you are and how you lead."[3]

2.)           Test Yourself
                "The stimulus of new experience outside your comfort zone can slowly but surely redefine and shore up the structure of your self."[4]

3.)           Offset Yourself
                " There is great good in working on yourself. In addition to the practical benefits, it’s a way of retaining your youthful energy. The moment you stop growing is the moment you grow old."[5]

When I first came across Fear Your Strengths, it was the following line that convinced me of the need to discuss this thought process at all;

“A whiff of brutal clarity, if it’s based on reality, is an essential component of leadership.”[6]

There's no time like the present. Get going!

Jim Naleid is a Life-long Entrepreneur, Change-Agent and Thought Leader, Managing Director of Naleid & Associates and Regional TEC (“The Executive Committee”) Chair leading a group of executives to become Better Leaders, Making Better Decisions with Better Results. http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimnaleid



[1] Kaplan, Robert E.; Kaiser, Robert B. (2013-04-01). Fear Your Strengths (BK Business) (pp. 27-28). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
[2] Kaplan, Robert E.; Kaiser, Robert B.; Fear Your Strengths (p. 35).
[3] Kaplan, Robert E.; Kaiser, Robert B.; Fear Your Strengths (p. 86).
[4] Kaplan, Robert E.; Kaiser, Robert B.; Fear Your Strengths (p. 89).
[5] Kaplan, Robert E.; Kaiser, Robert B.; Fear Your Strengths (p. 92).  
[6] Kaplan, Robert E.; Kaiser, Robert B.; Fear Your Strengths (p. 25).  


Monday, April 22, 2013

JEFFERSONIAN PARADOX...Hmmm?


 It's been decades since my folks took us to Washington, D.C. As a seven or eight-year old kid, (think Martin Richard), the impressive statues and monuments of those who were memorialized there remained in mind, but their words were of little concern to me then.

Just hours prior to the Boston bomb blasts, on Monday, April 15, 2013, we climbed the marble stairs to the Jefferson Memorial's rotunda. The first thought that occurred to me is that we (mankind) have always had a penchant for building significant edifices to one another. Nothing peculiar about that, it is just what it is.

A small wooden brown sign admonished visitors to maintain a quiet dignity while visiting in order to allow others to reflect on whatever they came to consider.

The first view of the interior walls led me to these words on the Southwest Portico;
"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and constitutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as a civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
-Excerpted from a letter to Samuel Kercheval, July 12, 1816.
This fascinated me. I had to read and re-read to make sure of its' meaning.
Given the times in which we live and the significant societal shifts taking place, the words "institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times," presented a challenge for me. It raised more questions than answers. One has to wonder, and perhaps serious historians and academics believe they know, but do you suppose Jefferson and his colleagues envisioned a "more enlightened" society in which citizens who benefitted from the freedoms a constitution sought to preserve would lead to a point in time wherein the unborn would prove to be unprotected, the institution of marriage itself would be pressed to a new definition, mad men and women would take up arms in senseless acts of wanton violence and slaughter one another in the streets?
You decide.
Turning 180 degrees to momentarily think this through, the words immortalized on the Northwest Portico, presented what seemed like a paradox to me:
"Almighty God hath created the mind free. All attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or burthens...are a departure from the plan of the holy Author of our religion...No man shall be compelled to frequent or support religious worship or ministry or shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief, but all men shall be free to profess and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion. I know but one code of morality for men whether acting singly or collectively."
-Excerpted from A Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom, drafted in 1777. First introduced in the Virginia General Assembly in 1779, after he had become Governor. Passed by the Virginia Assembly in 1786, while Jefferson was serving as Minister to France. The last sentence is excerpted from a letter to James Madison, August 28, 1789, as he was returning to America to assume his position as Secretary of State.
My concerns faded after turning to the Southwest and Northeast Porticos.
Southwest Portico
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men. We...solemnly publish and declare, that these colonies are and of a right ought to be free and independent states...and for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honour."
-Excerpted from the Declaration of Independence, 1776.
Northeast Portico
"God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever. Commerce between master and slave is despotism. Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Establish the law for educating the common people. This it is the business of the state to effect and on a general plan."
-Excerpted from multiple sources: "A Summary View of the Rights of British America," "Notes on the State of Virginia," "The Autobiography," letter to George Wythe (1790), letter to George Washington (1786).
Go back and re-read the first and second sentence of the above, "...these liberties are the gift of God."  Let's just take the position that the words of Thomas Jefferson cast in stone here on the interior Porticoes of the Jefferson Monument are indeed his words and based upon his beliefs. If so, there is no paradox after all.

While on one hand Jefferson acknowledged that life is fluid and society is apt to experience certain change, it also is clear that he believed in God Almighty, attributed the creation of man and earth to Him and at the same time wasn't inclined to force those convictions upon anyone else. Having said that, Jefferson evidently concluded that the laws of reason and freedom that he espoused came from the same source, this Creator, this God Almighty.

Leaders like Jefferson are very special, of course. Relatively few achieve or are credited with such great things. This man set one of many important examples that all of us should aspire to. The greatest of these is the fact that he knew what he believed. He put his beliefs in writing and shared them appropriately with others now with long-lasting benefit for many. Business leaders do well to take this example into consideration, that is, to make their beliefs known, hold them dear and clearly communicate them to those they expect to be followers.

[As an aside; I'd love to have the opportunity to ask him if he thought the Almighty God, the Creator he spoke of would be the one that would need to adapt to a society of 'enlightened' mores over time or vice versa. Wouldn't you?]

Jim Naleid is a Life-long Entrepreneur, Change-Agent and Thought Leader, Managing Director of Naleid & Associates and Regional TEC (“The Executive Committee”) Chair leading a group of executives to become Better Leaders, Making Better Decisions with Better Results. http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimnaleid

Monday, January 7, 2013

LEADERSHIP DISTRACTIONS



Leaders cannot afford to be distracted from their primary objectives by world and national events. Lord knows there are plenty of them. It happened to me over the past two weeks. With the main calendar holidays falling on a Tuesday, many of us just felt out of sorts, so to speak.

TAKE YOUR PICK OR ADD TO THE LIST

Hurricane Sandy, an election, Sandy Hook Elementary School the "Fiscal Cliff" and who cares to add to a long list of others led us to yearend, perhaps a bit numb and well, distracted. At our place, we chose to occupy our down and quiet time reading. Besides interacting with family and close friends, We ignored the nightly news and Sunday talk shows - tired of it all. We reengaged with the world to some degree on January 2.

Since then my conversations with business leaders planted the theme of this post in mind. Leaders cannot afford to be distracted but that doesn't mean they aren't concerned about all of the above. It won't surprise you to know that to a person, they are very concerned about Leadership, theirs' and that of the POTUS, to say nothing of the political morass that swirls thickly around him.

MASTERING THE SKILLS - EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND MORE

Thinking about those leaders I have the privilege of working with; they accept the serious responsibility of leading effectively and diligently incorporating new things learned as societal norms and attitudes shift. All, to one degree or another, possess an emotional intelligence, not unlike that which is discussed in a fine work now dated by some years but pertinent nonetheless , Primal Leadership (Daniel Goleman  @DanielGolemanEI;  Richard Boyatzis  @RBoyatzis, Dr. Annie McKee  @anniemckee; Harvard Press).

They realize that despite whatever regulations, executives orders and government mandates that are imposed upon them, they still must hone their strategic and tactical skills that lead them to become better leaders, making better decisions with better results. With this in mind, as much as I tried, I could not distance myself from wondering about these men and women and how their determination to lead for the greater good would be compared to the tactics of the Leader of the Free World.

HISTORICAL PRECENDENT - NOTHING LIKE IT

I won't dwell on this but it does confuse me because I go back to Eisenhower's days and while admittedly I was much too young to fully appreciate much of anything, from my age of reason on, I haven't observed anything like what we all are watching today. I am thankful for the internet for giving me access to literally thousands of bright, articulate thought-leaders. In the old days, there was a reliable portfolio of great teachers, but today we can learn from untold numbers of them and that's a good thing.

I'll let the historians chronicle the leadership attributes of our current President but I also don't believe that any professionals I work with would attempt to use  or recommend that his model as one for success in their worlds. http://www.franksonnenbergonline.com/blog/counterfeit-leadership/

CORPORATE v. POLITICAL LEADERSHIP

One of the four books I took on over the New Year's long weekend was Managing With A Conscience, 2nd Edition; (Frank Sonnenberg  @FSonnenberg). Frank's one of the folks I'm alluding to above and as you've likely noted, wrote a terrific post to his blog entitled Counterfeit Leadership. When I first came across some of Frank's thoughts, to be honest, I concluded that while well-intentioned, he was perhaps a bit naive. Happily, I read on and began to follow Frank. In so doing, I found that he believes not only in the goodness of humanity but is convinced that leaders must and can lead with "goodness" intact. It wasn't that I thought otherwise, it's just that I had not come across anyone who put it out there in the same way. That's high praise when you consider the many renowned authors that most of us have read.

While time management and priorities require discipline, it is the leaders I speak of who take advantage of the speed and easy access with which we gain the insight shared by so many that leaves us with little excuse than to attempt to become the best leaders we can possibly be.

Leaders cannot afford to be distracted and must go on leading regardless of how difficult and challenging a national or local government may make it. Whether it's a 5-point this or a 10-point that, it is in the thirst for knowledge and better ways of doing things that will be passed from this group of leaders to the next and perhaps it is a foregone conclusion that relying upon government of any kind will distract but will not destroy free enterprising and life-long learning leaders altogether.

Jim Naleid is a Serial Entrepreneur, Change-Agent and Thought Leader, Managing Director of Naleid & Associates and Regional TEC (“The Executive Committee”) Chair leading a group of executives to become Better Leaders, Making Better Decisions with Better Results. http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimnaleid