Stock markets are hitting new highs. Housing starts are on
the rise and home values may have hit bottom and are trending up. The private
sector is adding jobs and the unemployment rate is improving while, life for
the long-term unemployed or out-of-the-workforce, statistically is not.
Even though U.S. inflation is pegged at 1.6%, every
household that does breakfast and dinner at home is feeling the squeeze of higher
commodity prices, foodstuffs and the fuel it takes to shop. Insurance premiums;
health, auto and liability all are on the rise. Just the other day folks I was
with engaged in that old 'game' of "Remember when tap beers were a dime
and a gallon of gas was twenty-five cents?"
WHAT ELSE IS NEW?
There is a different answer that's
appropriate for the individual investor than might apply to the business leader.
For today, my objective is to stick with business.
Managers ought to be thinking
seriously about what the most significant disruption to their business could be
in the coming months while their charges concentrate on executing the plan that
has been entrusted to them. Those that are complacent and fail to concern themselves with possible
and significant disruptions to their business pay a stiff price for doing so.
It's been five short years since
the economic disruption spurned by loose banking practices caught up with
everyone. Some are convinced banks once again will be at the center of the next
disruptive force that could affect your
business.
READ BETWEEN THE LINES
Neil Weinberg, Editor-in-Chief at
American Banker caught my attention with his recent blog post title,
"Beware of the Banking Bubble."[1]
Let's face it, since the so-called "Dot.com Bubble" disrupted the
easy flow of money thirteen years ago, we tend to pay more than usual attention
to bubbles forming, or worse, those that are about to burst.
Mr. Weinberg voices a concern that
hearkens back to the overall attitude bankers held in 2007 and he fears that
some of the same are surfacing today. Among other things, he notes that
"Compressed net interest margins mean bankers face pressure to under-price
risk to win loan business and to look to other questionable tactics to turn a
buck." Think fees - back-end,
front-end, small print, you name it. Retail and Commercial borrowers and
depositors know what Weinberg is talking about. He then asks a relevant
question; "In what imprudent ways are bankers likely to respond to these
various pressures?" Great question.
Enter stage right, the Federal
Reserve and Ben Bernanke. Edward Luce at The Financial Times opened a recent
piece by stating the obvious, "The Federal Reserve under Ben Bernanke has
been the only serious economic actor in Washington."[2] If
you're leading a company today, it goes without saying that the disadvantage of
not being able to print money in order to buy down your own debt handicaps you
against your competitors. The good news is that neither can your competitors do
so. The bad news is banks will make life miserable for lenders when and if
rates head north.
While Luce generally heaps praise
on the Fed Chairman, he acknowledges that, "Without the Fed's easy money,
the stock market would be languishing and unemployment would be rising."
As a former portfolio manager, this scares the (insert your own) out of me. Mr. Weinberg quotes from Moises Naim's[3]
new book, The End of Power, wherein the author accurately noted that
"When the Fed has met a new problem it has usually engineered a new
solution." Note that the Fed has signaled its intent to discontinue this engineered strategy once unemployment
falls to 6.5%. Many are urging Bernanke to curtail the practice sooner.
MANAGE THE DISRUPTIVE FORCE
Leaders of any size company ought
to be thinking about the next disruptive force that will affect their business
and in so doing will make a huge mistake if banking isn't on their short list.
Everything from short-term lending to insurance premiums will be adversely
impacted when the Fed halts the presses leading to higher interest rates and a
less than subtle upward inflationary course.
This is a discussion that must
take place within companies, now. Strategy considerations should include
everything finance related, including the unorthodox. It might make sense to
renegotiate a higher rate on your current short-term or line of credits and
lock them in for as long as possible. It might make sense to take advantage of
rates and increase your debt on the balance sheet if a three to five year term
is offered. If you've contemplated selling out, it might make sense to do it as
soon as practical while cheap money is still available to your potential
suitors. In other words, pull your team together and put all of the banking
"If's" and "Might-make-sense" ideas on the table.
Ben Bernanke has been frequently
reminding whoever is listening that "There is only so much the Fed can
do." So, manage the potential disruptive force a change in Fed policy will
bring to business and banking practices. Move it up on your to-do list, now.
As you if you didn't have enough to
concern yourself with!
[1]
Neil Weinberg; Editor-in-Chief at American Banker; "Beware of the Banking
Bubble", March 7 2013
[2]
Edward Luce; Columnist for The Financial Times; "A good engineer that
knows his own limits", March 10, 2013
[3] Moisés Naím (born 1952) is a Venezuelan
writer and columnist. He is a Senior Associate in the International Economics program
at the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace.
Vistage Sued by Long Time CEO Group Member for $5.3 Million. Please See Press Release at http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/vistage-sued-by-long-time-ceo-group-member-for-53-million-445387.php . Please contact us if you have had a similar experience.
ReplyDeleteVistage Sued by Long Time CEO Group Member for $5.3 Million. Please See Press Release at www.MemberLawsuit.com. Please contact us if you have had a similar experience.
ReplyDelete